GE and the Honeywell. Argument For And Against The Commission Decision Essay

GE and the Honeywell. Argument For And Against The Commission Decision - Essay Example According to Pfanz (2001), the categories of bundling might have included pure and mixed. Indeed, as the paper progresses it would be simpler to deduce the category. The Commission suggested that the bundling technique would have many pleasant effects on the merged GE and Honeywell’s competitors in the markets for aerospace equipment and jet engines. This is because the rivals’ market shares would be eroded by their incapability to compete with the joined entity package deals, which in turn would lower the profitability of their rivals leading to their exit (Schlossberg & American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law 2008, p. 17). The Commission thought that the ability of the company to employ bundling would enable the combined corporate to offer complimentary goods at a reduced price compared to when the products are sold separately. The Commission suggested that bundling would lower the revenues for the GE’s and Honey well’s Competitors in the market. The reduction of revenues would be advantageous to the companies since it would reduce their competitors’ ability to invest. Moreover, it would augment the companies’ capabilities of competing effectively. According to the Commission’s view, the prices could rise in future, and this would cause harm to their rivals and customers in the market. From the Commission’s presentation, bundling would have an ultimate effect of shutting out markets for the competitors who deals with single line of products. Such foreclose would help in the decrease of investments by other competitors or even eliminate them. The Commission pre dicted that the combined business would have incentives by bundling its companies’ products. This would make its competitors to be less competitive by depriving then revenues. This implies that the firms that have been deprived their revenues would not cover their fixed cost. He argued that this would be advantageous to the EG and Honeywell, since it would have unpleasant effects on their competitors spending and thus they would not compete effectively in future. In his argument, the Commission proved his points by providing proof that Honeywell uses bundling in strategic way called â€Å"multi-product† bids. Moreover, the Commission got evidence from the companies’ competitors proving that they faced Honeywell bundling, which made it difficult for them to compete. Therefore, the Commission said that if bundling were to continue, their rivals would withdraw particularly the Rockwell Collins Company

Critical appraisal-EBP Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Critical appraisal-EBP - Essay Example However, the article provides a description of the research method, which is a mixed method approach (Qualitative and quantitative methods), indicating a limited sense of its appropriateness in relation to validity of data. Taking into consideration the validity of the information provided in the article, the author describes a variety of data collection methods that were applied, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methods i.e. structured interviews and the assessment of disease information from recorded materials. Additionally, the article provides a comprehensive data regarding how the data was analyzed leading to the results discussed. This provides a proof to the readers regarding the validity of the results and the data collected. The data analysis included descriptive approaches, which is a qualitative method and a combination of regression modeling to facilitate testing and estimation. A total of 94 participants were involved in the analysis: This analysis is sufficient taking into consideration that it combined both qualitative and quantitative approaches; in addition, a large sample of the respondents was used in the analysis, information limitations that might have occurred due to selection a smaller sample for analysis were avoided. The purpose of this research is to assess psychosocial HQOL after treatment, using reported outcomes from patients. It is important to acknowledge that the information gained from the research may be used to undertake measures geared towards improving adolescents’ psychosocial HQOL service provision i.e. the research found out that approximately 18% of the recovered adolescents may be exposed to risks of impaired HQOL and provided a recommendation how the studies that should be conducted to reduce this risk. The overall results of the study indicated that patients rated their psychosocial HQOL as good; however this is generalized information, it does not provide specifics in relation to the